| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tony and Bryn Reina <reina_ga(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bradley Kieser <brad(at)kieser(dot)net>, <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
| Date: | 2004-04-01 20:56:18 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0404011352580.30491-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Thu, 1 Apr 2004, Tony and Bryn Reina wrote:
> let alone the storate limit of 2GB per
> > table. So sadly, PG would have to bow out of this IMHO unless someone
> > else nukes me on this!
> >
>
> I just checked the PostgreSQL website and it says that tables are limited to
> 16 TB not 2 GB.
Actually, it's 32 TB, which can be quadrupled by increasing the block size
to 32k, the maximum allowed, which would make the maximum table size 128
TB.
I just saw your response before firing off my previous messages.
Apologies if I came off harsh, but I've heard people at my office saying
similar things because they "heard it on the mailing lists" so it much be
true.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-04-01 22:15:51 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-04-01 20:48:45 | Re: Do Petabyte storage solutions exist? |