| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
| Cc: | <hong(dot)ge(at)yale(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: How can I have 2 completely seperated databases in |
| Date: | 2004-02-12 15:37:06 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0402120836000.4413-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Rod Taylor wrote:
> > But for seperating out applications from each other, there's really
> > nothing to be gained by putting each seperate database application into
> > it's own cluster.
>
> I believe the initial email requested individual logs, and presumably
> the ability to grant superuser access without risking a user crossing
> into another clients space.
Well, I got the feeling it was only the logs he wanted seperate, and if
that's all he wanted, then seperating will get him that, but there's a
cost, and I wanted to make sure he understood that as well.
I'm not sure he was intimating seperate super users, but I could
definitely see situations where that would be useful.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-02-12 15:37:32 | Re: 7.4 - FK constraint performance |
| Previous Message | Joshua Drake | 2004-02-12 15:35:22 | Re: How can I have 2 completely seperated databases in |