From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hans Näther <Hans(dot)Naether(at)charite(dot)de> |
Cc: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bug receiving NotificationResponse Message v3 |
Date: | 2004-01-28 12:25:40 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0401280720430.28547-100000@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Hans Nther wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I found a problem in the current jdbc driver. My application receives
> asynchronous notification messages from the backend. Using postgresql
> 7.1, it works. When I switch to postgresql 7.4, it doesn't work anymore.
> An exception postgresql.con.type is thrown in
> org.postgresql.core.QueryExecutor.executeV3. This is because 7.1 uses
> protocol version 2 and 7.4 uses protocol version 3. In version 3, the
> message format has changed, the message contains additional data
> (message length, additional information) => see
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/protocol-message-formats.html
> under NotificationResponse.
>
> So the function executeV3 needs to be changed, I propose the following
> change:
>
> ... (line 129):
> switch (c)
> {
> case 'A': // Asynchronous Notify
> int msglen = pgStream.ReceiveInteger(4); // added
> int pid = pgStream.ReceiveInteger(4);
> String msg = pgStream.ReceiveString(connection.getEncoding());
> String param = pgStream.ReceiveString(connection.getEncoding()); //
> added
> connection.addNotification(new
> org.postgresql.core.Notification(msg, pid));
> break;
> case 'B': // Binary Data Transfer
> ...
Good catch. I've applied the attached patch to the gborg cvs driver. I'm
not sure how well it will apply to the 7.4 version. This problem was also
present in the notification receiving in fastpath. Further the pid
field was being read in the wrong byte order.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-01-28 12:27:45 | Re: Bug receiving NotificationResponse Message v3 |
Previous Message | Bhushan Bhangale | 2004-01-28 10:47:42 | Re: jdbc connection string |