Re: Patch to readd documentation

From: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch to readd documentation
Date: 2004-01-25 02:31:21
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0401242128090.19339-100000@leary.csoft.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

On Sat, 24 Jan 2004, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Btw., creating a separate distribution for documentation is just a
> perfect way to make sure the documentation never gets read or
> maintained. If that is your plan then you might as well remove it.

The way to make sure the documentation is read is to put it on a website,
not have an xml document in subdirectory of the main package. The way to
make sure the documentation is maintained is to make the build process as
easy as possible.

Kris Jurka

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-25 17:28:49 Re: Patch to readd documentation
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-01-24 20:27:03 Re: Patch to readd documentation