From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CHECK versus a Table for an enumeration |
Date: | 2003-12-23 13:08:39 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0312230503590.25752-100000@main.cyber-office.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Melanie Bergeron wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I want to know what's better between these 2 solutions :
>
> CREATE TABLE user (
> ...
> user_type text CHECK(user_type='Root' OR user_type = 'Admin' OR
> user_type = 'Standard'));
Will you ever in your wildest dreams need more or different values in
user_type? If not them go here. I user this for well known, limited
sets - Male/Female.
> or the following :
>
> CREATE TABLE user_type(
> user_type_id integer PRIMARY KEY,
> user_type_desc text);
>
> CREATE TABLE user (
> ...
> user_type_id integer,
> CONSTRAINT user_type_exists FOREIGN KEY (user_type_id) REFERENCES
> user(user_type_id));
>
> I am really confused so I'll wait for your advices.
This when there is a chance, any chance, you'll need to add to the list or
make changes to user_type_desc.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - You usually get more than you pay for..."
"Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Bergeron | 2003-12-23 13:26:25 | Re: CHECK versus a Table for an enumeration |
Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2003-12-23 11:51:15 | Re: COPY - Ignore Problems |