From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Year of the Open-Source Database |
Date: | 2003-11-18 17:53:44 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0311180944570.21224-100000@main.cyber-office.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> It's one of the historic problems, actaully. Postgres was a database
> product that used PostQUEL. When SQL got put in, Postgres85 was
> born, and soon renamed PostgreSQL to highlight its SQL capabilities.
> But it's a mouthful. So people might correctly say, "Postgres
> (formally known as 'PostgreSQL' and formerly 'Postgres')." But it
> would cause grave confusion and general unhappiness.
Well that does add some confusion. The reason I even mentioned it was
because of a message/thread earlier this month (last month?) about
Postgres vs. PostgreSQL. It is a mouthful for sure and I find myself
slurring the QL so it comes out mostly as Postgres (unless I've had a few
pints then I drool the last :-).
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-11-18 17:55:25 | Re: 7.4 not yet covered on /. |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2003-11-18 17:43:45 | Re: Freshmeat? |