From: | Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Storage consumption |
Date: | 2003-11-15 09:59:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0311150454470.10394-100000@leary.csoft.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Troels Arvin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some very data-intensive projects it's interesting how much space the
> DBMS uses for the storage of data, so I'm investigating how space
> efficient different DBMSes are.
>
> In the PostgreSQL manual, it's written that values of the type INTEGER
> take op four bytes. I was curious about how close to real-World this
> number is, so I did a test: How much space does PostgreSQL use when
> storing 100000 rows where each row consists of a single INTEGER value?
>
You are measuring the space used to store one row of one int column. To
test the space used just by one int column a more accurate test would be
to measure the difference in disk usage between a table with one int
column and a table with two int columns.
Kris Jurka
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-11-15 10:13:48 | Re: Grant alter privileges |
Previous Message | jini us | 2003-11-15 05:36:00 | Re: embedded postgresql |