| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rick Gigger <rick(at)alpinenetworking(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: simple question |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 18:12:18 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0311131110270.612-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Rick Gigger wrote:
> Is this correct?
>
> vacuum by itself just cleans out the old extraneous tuples so that they
> aren't in the way anymore
> vacuum analyze rebuilds indexes. If you add an index to a table it won't be
> used until you vacuum analyze it
> vacuum full actually compresses the table on disk by reclaiming the space
> from the old tuples after they have been removed.
You don't have to analyze AFTER index creation, just at some point in
time. I.e.:
create table test ...
import into table test 1000000 rows
analyze test;
create index test_field1_dx on test (id);
select * from test where id=4567; <- this will likely use the index.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bjørn T Johansen | 2003-11-13 18:47:17 | Re: RHEL |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-11-13 18:09:06 | Re: More Praise for 7.4RC2 |