Re: Recomended FS

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Michael Teter <mteter(at)1scom(dot)net>
Cc: postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Date: 2003-10-24 23:23:47
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0310241722340.26488-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Michael Teter wrote:

> Here are some recent benchmarks on different Linux filesystems. As with
> any benchmarks, take what you will from the numbers.
>
> Note the Summary section, and then the detailed benchmark numbers (if
> you have a stomach for huge tables of pure numbers :)
>
> http://fsbench.netnation.com/

Right, but NONE of the benchmarks I've seen have been with IDE drives with
their cache disabled, which is the only way to make them reliable under
postgresql should something bad happen. but thanks for the benchmarks,
I'll look them over.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lynn.Tilby 2003-10-24 23:27:16 no records returned
Previous Message Michael Teter 2003-10-24 23:16:16 Re: Recomended FS