From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)fireserve(dot)net> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: partitioning |
Date: | 2003-10-24 22:35:55 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310241632060.26036-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Dennis Gearon wrote:
> On small productions systems, single disk, etc, how do you guys like to
> partition the system? Postgres dirs also?
I'll assume you're talking Linux, but other flavors of unix would be
similar:
On small systems, I generally put a pair IDE drives in and mirror
everything from one to the other (they're cheap, and mirror sets have
saved my butt on many occasions.)
/ <- 250 Meg (including /boot
/usr <- 1 to 4 gigs
/tmp <- 1 gig
/var <- 1 gig
/db <- where pgsql data lives, as big as it needs to be.
/www <- where apache data lives, as big as it needs to be.
/usr/local OR /opt depending on OS <- ~ 1 to 4 gig
The main reason for doing this kind of thing is so that if some process
goes nuts and fills up your logs (/var) temp directory (/tmp) or database
partition (/db) it won't bring everything else to its knees, just the area
it affected.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Teter | 2003-10-24 23:16:16 | Re: Recomended FS |
Previous Message | Michael Bauer | 2003-10-24 22:28:49 | DBD::PgPP::CursorResponse |