Re: Recomended FS

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Recomended FS
Date: 2003-10-23 15:22:30
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0310230922070.15290-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
> > I believe that 3ware have a non blocking implementation of ATA RAID -
> > I intend to sell the Promise and obtain a 3ware in the next month of
> > so and test this out.
>
>
> I use 3Ware exclusively for my ATA-RAID solutions. The nice thing about
> them is that
> they are REAL hardware RAID and the use the SCSI layer within Linux so
> you address
> them as a standard SCSI device.
>
> Also their support is in the kernel... no wierd, experimental patching.
>
> On a Dual 2000 Athlon MP I was able to sustain 50MB/sec over large
> copys (4+ gigs). Very, Very happy with them.

Do they survive the power plug pulling test I was talking about elsewhere
in this thread?

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Childs 2003-10-23 15:30:00 Re: Trigger
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-10-23 15:22:02 Re: Recomended FS