From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Recomended FS |
Date: | 2003-10-23 15:22:30 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310230922070.15290-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > I believe that 3ware have a non blocking implementation of ATA RAID -
> > I intend to sell the Promise and obtain a 3ware in the next month of
> > so and test this out.
>
>
> I use 3Ware exclusively for my ATA-RAID solutions. The nice thing about
> them is that
> they are REAL hardware RAID and the use the SCSI layer within Linux so
> you address
> them as a standard SCSI device.
>
> Also their support is in the kernel... no wierd, experimental patching.
>
> On a Dual 2000 Athlon MP I was able to sustain 50MB/sec over large
> copys (4+ gigs). Very, Very happy with them.
Do they survive the power plug pulling test I was talking about elsewhere
in this thread?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Childs | 2003-10-23 15:30:00 | Re: Trigger |
Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-23 15:22:02 | Re: Recomended FS |