| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgresql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: further testing on IDE drives |
| Date: | 2003-10-14 17:29:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0310141128580.2514-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "scott.marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> writes:
> > open_sync was WAY faster at this than the other two methods.
>
> Do you not have open_datasync? That's the preferred method if
> available.
Nope, when I try to start postgresql with it set to that, I get this error
message:
FATAL: invalid value for "wal_sync_method": "open_datasync"
This is on RedHat 9, but I have the same problem on a RH 7.2 box as well.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Karppinen | 2003-10-14 18:02:45 | Re: [PERFORM] Sun performance - Major discovery! |
| Previous Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-10-14 17:26:45 | Re: [SQL] sql performance and cache |