Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.
Date: 2003-10-09 16:16:38
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0310091016001.16714-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:52:36AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> > Fact: If you write your application to work with ODBC -> MySQL
> > connectivity, you can write a closed source app and sell it for money and
>
> Fact: nobody's ever tested any of this in court, so you're basically
> risking it.
>
> I think if people want legal advice about the status of MySQL's
> claims about GPL, they'd best consult a lawyer who knows a lot about
> software licenses.

My point is that MySQL is licensed under the GPL, so what MySQL says is
not as important as what the GPL says. I.e. consult a lawyer if you're
wondering, but don't listen to MySQL AB for your legal advice.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan Bartlett 2003-10-09 16:20:15 Re: Response from MySql AB (Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs.
Previous Message David Shadovitz 2003-10-09 16:05:18 Procedure for adding a column