From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> |
Cc: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FreeBSD page size (was Re: The results of my |
Date: | 2003-09-04 21:56:22 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0309041556060.28693-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Vivek Khera wrote:
> >>>>> "SC" == Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>
> >> I need to step in and do 2 things:
> SC> Thanks for posting that. Let me know if you have any questions while
> SC> doing your testing. I've found that using 16K blocks on FreeBSD
> SC> results in about an 8% speedup in writes to the database, fwiw.
>
> Just double checking: if I do this, then I need to halve the
> parameters in postgresql.conf that involve buffers, specifically,
> max_fsm_pages and shared_buffers. I think max_fsm_pages should be
> adjusted since the number of pages in the system overall has been
> halved.
>
> Anything else that should be re-tuned for this?
Yes, effective_cache_size as well is measured in pgsql blocks.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-09-04 22:12:46 | Re: FreeBSD page size |
Previous Message | Vivek Khera | 2003-09-04 20:56:09 | Re: FreeBSD page size |