| From: | Tomka Gergely <tomka(at)zeus(dot)gau(dot)hu> |
|---|---|
| To: | matt <matt(at)ymogen(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Bill Moran <wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load |
| Date: | 2003-08-28 06:38:47 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308280837160.31338-100000@zeus.gau.hu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
2003-08-27 ragyogó napján matt ezt üzente:
> Yeah, I can imagine getting 5% extra from a slim kernel and
> super-optimised PG.
Hm, about 20%, but only for the correctness - 20% not help you also :(
> The FS is ext3, metadata journaling (the default), mounted noatime.
Worst fs under linux :) Try xfs.
--
Tomka Gergely
"S most - vajon barbárok nélkül mi lesz velünk?
Ők mégiscsak megoldás voltak valahogy..."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomka Gergely | 2003-08-28 06:51:33 | Re: Hardware recommendations to scale to silly load |
| Previous Message | Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai | 2003-08-28 06:23:51 | Weird constraint output |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-28 06:45:14 | Re: The results of my PostgreSQL/filesystem performance tests |
| Previous Message | Tarhon-Onu Victor | 2003-08-28 06:29:03 | Re: pgsql inserts problem |