| From: | "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | postgres general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Buglist |
| Date: | 2003-08-19 12:37:30 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308190523480.28162-100000@main.cyber-office.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On 19 Aug 2003, Bo Lorentsen wrote:
> Also have anyone tryed to compare the new transaction model in MySQL 4.x
> to PostgreSQL ?
Bo, I've recently started having to deal with MySQL. (Web sites
wanting/using php _need/have-to-have_ MySQL. Their words not mine.) And
from going from a "I dislike MySQL" to "I'm really hating MySQL" has been
getting easier and easier.
My dealings with MySQL are for the 3.xx version but I semi-followed a
thread on this several months ago so feel fully qualified to to throw in
my views. :-) My take on others research was that MySQL transaction
model is a bubble gum and bailing wire add on not an integral part of
MySQL. It _was_ tacked onto the top of the database so if either it or
MySQL failed you were likely to loose data.
> I'm looking forward to recive even more constructive arguements :-)
How about "Friends don't let friends use MySQL"?
Hopefully others with a stonger knowledge will provide this.
Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Francois Suter | 2003-08-19 12:59:07 | Re: Mailing list in French |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-19 12:31:33 | Re: Buglist |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bo Lorentsen | 2003-08-19 13:26:27 | Re: Buglist |
| Previous Message | Shridhar Daithankar | 2003-08-19 12:31:33 | Re: Buglist |