Re: Perfomance Tuning

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net>
Cc: PgSQL Performance ML <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Perfomance Tuning
Date: 2003-08-12 14:34:56
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0308120834290.3744-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 11 Aug 2003, Ron Johnson wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 19:50, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > > Well, yeah. But given the Linux propensity for introducing major
> > > features in "minor" releases (and thereby introducing all the
> > > attendant bugs), I'd think twice about using _any_ Linux feature
> > > until it's been through a major version (e.g. things introduced in
> > > 2.4.x won't really be stable until 2.6.x) -- and even there one is
> > > taking a risk[1].
> >
> > Dudes, seriously - switch to FreeBSD :P
>
> But, like, we want a *good* OS... 8-0

What, like Unixware? (ducking quickly) (*_*)

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-08-12 14:36:22 Re: Perfomance Tuning
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2003-08-12 14:31:57 Re: Perfomance Tuning