| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance Tuning |
| Date: | 2003-08-12 14:27:52 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0308120826090.3744-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Well, yeah. But given the Linux propensity for introducing major
> > features in "minor" releases (and thereby introducing all the
> > attendant bugs), I'd think twice about using _any_ Linux feature
> > until it's been through a major version (e.g. things introduced in
> > 2.4.x won't really be stable until 2.6.x) -- and even there one is
> > taking a risk[1].
>
> Dudes, seriously - switch to FreeBSD :P
Yeah, it's nice to have a BUG FREE OS huh? ;^)
And yes, I've used FreeBSD, it's quite good, but I kept getting the
feeling it wasn't quite done. Especially the installation documentation.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2003-08-12 14:28:56 | Re: On Linux Filesystems |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-08-12 13:11:53 | Re: Odd problem with performance in duplicate database |