Re: Smaller template database?

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Jeremy Trammell <jtrammell(at)rpco2(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Smaller template database?
Date: 2003-08-01 15:14:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0308010912570.29728-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Jeremy Trammell wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to use PostgreSQL as an embedded SQL database server, but
> the 30 meg installation size is killing me... A quick scan of the
> various docs/FAQs around here have made no mention of any way to trim
> down that template database. Am I missing something? Why must it be so
> large?

Are you sure all that is the template0/1 databases? With WAL segments
taking 16 Megs by default, that may be half of it.

If you're looking for a better choice for imbedding, look at firebird.

http://sourceforge.net/projects/firebird/

It's got a much smaller footprint and doesn't require as much regular
daily maintenance as Postgresql does.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris White (cjwhite) 2003-08-01 15:18:43 Problem restoring large objects with pg_restore
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-01 15:13:11 Re: fyi regarding error I've seen posted before