Re: Help convincing a vendor....

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>
Cc: <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Help convincing a vendor....
Date: 2003-07-15 20:14:25
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0307151413550.27746-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 11:28:32AM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
> > I'm involved in a beta for some extensions for said vendor, and am looking
> > for COGENT
> > arguments for them to include BOTH MySQL (they already include MySQL in the
> > package, and
> > for the "other OS" may "have" to do PG for stability reasons).
>
> Well, what about, "We have to use PostgreSQL, because our accounting
> department requires stability in numeric data. In MySQL, numeric()
> gets stored internally as a float, and that leads to potential
> problems in accounting applications."
>
> I didn't know about the numeric/float issue in MySQL, but I know for
> sure that it would automatically disqualify it for anything we'd use
> it for.

See my recent correction about this. however, it wouldn't surprise me to
find out that while they get stored as strings, they quite likely get
operated on as floats...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-07-15 20:33:46 Re: Help convincing a vendor....
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-07-15 20:01:04 Re: OpenOffice + PG