| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | <cmarin(at)dims(dot)com>, "Pgsql-General-post (E-mail)" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A creepy story about dates. How to prevent it? |
| Date: | 2003-06-18 17:04:25 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0306181102280.4992-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 18 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> =?iso-8859-1?Q?Conxita_Mar=EDn?= <comarin(at)telefonica(dot)net> writes:
> > I suggest that maybe the pg_dump has to store the datestyle in order to
> > prevent this problems, no?
>
> In 7.3.3 and later, pg_dump forces ISO datestyle while dumping, to
> forestall exactly this problem. Sorry that you got bit.
>
> When you're doing an update, it's often a good idea to use the newer
> version's pg_dump to extract the data from the older database. We
> keep pg_dump compatible with back versions (presently it handles
> anything back to 7.0) so that you can take advantage of bugfixes in
> newer pg_dumps. Like this one ...
That reminds me, did we get the date parsing fixed so that you can't
insert 22/03/2003 into a european database (or conversely, 03/22/2003 into
a US database) ? I.e the problem where the date parser assumed you meant
it the other way...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2003-06-18 17:06:31 | Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: |
| Previous Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-06-18 17:00:47 | Re: Linux supports hot-swappable hardware? [was Re: |