Re: join syntax

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Jodi Kanter <jkanter(at)virginia(dot)edu>
Cc: Postgres SQL List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: join syntax
Date: 2003-06-17 18:53:48
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0306171253220.2647-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Jodi Kanter wrote:

> One of my colleagues has created a database where he has the same field
> name in two tables and uses this field to link his tables rather than
> some arbitrary value. For example, he has used "exp_id" in two tables.
> When writing his joins he uses a syntax that says something like JOIN ON
> EXP_ID. Can someone tell me what that syntax should be? I am not very
> familiar with it since I typically use the syntax where one field is set
> equal to the other.
> Personally I prefer not to set databases up this way but cannot seem to
> convince him of this. And yet I am supposed to now help him with his
> database and application.. Is there some documentation that would define
> this type of syntax? How is this handled if you have more than one table
> in the join? It does not appear that this format would allow for this.

If you're joining two tables on a field that has the same name you can use
a natural join.

select * from table1 natural join table2;

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Radu-Adrian Popescu 2003-06-17 18:58:12 Re: Catching DML exceptions in PL/pgSQL
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2003-06-17 18:49:44 Re: disabling triggers