| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Nigel J(dot) Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk>, Network Administrator <netadmin(at)vcsn(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: - what protocol for an Internet postgres |
| Date: | 2003-05-19 14:42:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0305190842010.18757-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Sat, 17 May 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews(at)investsystems(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> > This evening I try again and as before get no where. However, I then go into
> > the firewall setup and disable one particular rule that opens all remote
> > hosts/ports for a particular service. [ and then things worked ]
>
> Ooh, been there done that...
>
> I'd suggest watching the traffic with tcpdump or some such tool. I'll
> bet there are transactions going on between ports that you didn't think
> you needed to open.
FYI, if you have to take a look at your net traffic, look for ethereal.
It comes with RH nowadays, and is a very nice GUI traffic sniffer.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | alex b. | 2003-05-19 14:43:59 | Re: mod_perl + PostgreSQL implementation::SOLVED |
| Previous Message | fliptop | 2003-05-19 11:57:03 | Re: mod_perl + PostgreSQL implementation |