Re: jdbc connection process size

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Kathy Zhu <Kathy(dot)Zhu(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: jdbc connection process size
Date: 2003-05-08 22:22:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0305081621230.11937-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Run top and look at the SIZE and SHARE settings.

If size is 10M and share is 9.9M, then no biggie, as the delta is only
0.1M

On Thu, 8 May 2003, Kathy Zhu wrote:

> How to check that ??
>
> > To: Kathy Zhu <Kathy(dot)Zhu(at)sun(dot)com>
> > Subject: Re: [GENERAL] jdbc connection process size
> > From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
> > Date: 08 May 2003 17:42:29 -0400
> > User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) Emacs/20.7
> >
> > Kathy Zhu <Kathy(dot)Zhu(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I hope this time somebody will answer my question here:
> > >
> > > For each jdbc connection, postmaster starts a process that takes 10M.
> >
> > A lot of that (program text, shared buffers etc) is shared between
> > backends. What's the actual unshared space taken up by each backend?
> >
> > -Doug
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message scott.marlowe 2003-05-08 22:39:15 Re: Error executing dbcreate
Previous Message Kathy Zhu 2003-05-08 22:20:08 Re: jdbc connection process size