From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <lista(at)profit-ti(dot)com(dot)br> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Hyper-Threading |
Date: | 2003-05-08 16:19:16 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0305081017160.11328-100000@css120.ihs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 8 May 2003 lista(at)profit-ti(dot)com(dot)br wrote:
> Hi People!
> As a project manager I decided to migrate the full project from Oracle
> to PostgreSQL.
>
> We bought a new Intel box to host the database, it is a dual Xeon 2.2
> and I intend to use it with a FreeBSD 4.8 wich support Intel Hyper-
> Threading.
>
> I Woul like to know if the PostgreSQL 7.3.2 will take advantage from
> Hyper-Threading?
Postgresql is not a multi-threaded app, so my guess is no, it won't. but
if the OS benefits from it then you may see a slight speed increase.
while a neat idea, hyperthreading seems to be promising far more than it
is delivering.
In testing on Windows XP with SQL server, the performance increase on a
single CPU machine with hyperthreading enabled was only about 20%. Of
course, Microsoft charges you for a whole nother CPU for that 20%
performance gain. :-)
The box Being dual CPU will make a bigger difference than being
hyperthreaded.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Doug McNaught | 2003-05-08 16:20:27 | Re: Hyper-Threading |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-05-08 16:08:20 | Re: could not read transaction log directory ...? |