Re: PL/Java (was: stored procedures)

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Petre Scheie <petre(dot)scheie(at)nextelpartners(dot)com>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/Java (was: stored procedures)
Date: 2003-03-13 22:35:23
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0303131525420.21667-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Petre Scheie wrote:

> My DBA and I looked at the link on using SQL for stored procedures
> (thanks Neil!) and he raised a couple concerns:
>
> 1. In the example given, the query is directed at just one table; he
> says he needs to join multiple tables, and have it return a set. Can PG
> do this?
>
> 2. The docs say this ability to return a set is deprecated and may be
> removed in a future release. Why is that? Has this functionality been
> replaced by something else (better?)
>
> Sorry if these are really dumb questions. We're trying to use pg
> (instead of O or SS) but we're new to it.

Sure, that's no problem. Has this guy read much of the docs yet? it's a
worthy investment of time, and they're quite good:

Main 7.3 docs page:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=0&file=index.html

Here's some marketing bullet points from the programmer's guide in 7.3:

* User programmable and built-in functions
* User extensible types, as well as a rich variety of built-ins
* User definable operators
* User definable aggregates
* Rules
* Triggers
* Procedural Languages:
** PL/pgSQL
** PL/Tcl
** PL/Perl
** PL/Python
** PL/R (coming in 7.3)

It's the best database you've never heard of (before now). :-)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Luc Lachance 2003-03-13 22:36:48 Re: Function in selection?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-13 22:23:42 Re: timestamp 'default' question