Re: 7.4?

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Ericson Smith <eric(at)did-it(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.4?
Date: 2003-02-25 00:46:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0302241743080.14765-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 24 Feb 2003, Ericson Smith wrote:

>
> > From 7.3 to 7.4 the biggest changes planned so far:
> > - windows native support <-- gartner gives it a 90% chance of making it
> > into the main disto... :-)
> > - fix for in() performance issue <-- already in CVS tip
> > - partitioning or tablespaces <-- who know? seriously, who?
> > - vacuum will be able to compact out unused space <-- Tom Lane
>
> Will we be able to run the new vacuum system without locking the tables?

Vacuum only locks the tables now for a second or so.

You might want to look at using regular vacuums more often. In my
testing, vacuum (non full) uses <2% of the CPU on a heavily loaded server.
Between the low load of vacuum and having higher fsm settings, you might
obviate the need to regular vacuum any more than once a day or week or
whatever.

In response to

  • Re: 7.4? at 2003-02-24 20:53:14 from Ericson Smith

Responses

  • reindex at 2003-02-25 05:04:53 from Andrew Bartley

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug McNaught 2003-02-25 02:08:11 Re: Strange error (Socket command option unknown)
Previous Message Joseph Shraibman 2003-02-25 00:13:21 How do I change the server encoding?