| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net>, "D'Arcy J(dot)M(dot) Cain" <darcy(at)druid(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Options for growth |
| Date: | 2003-01-23 18:19:36 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0301231117480.2135-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 23 Jan 2003, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Curt Sampson kirjutas N, 23.01.2003 kell 17:42:
> > If the OS can handle the scheduling (which, last I checked, Linux couldn't,
>
> When did you do your checking ?
> (just curious, not to start a flame war ;)
>
> > at least not without patches), eight or sixteen
> > CPUs will be fine.
Yeah, take a look here:
http://www.sgi.com/servers/altix/
64 CPUs seems scalable enough for me. :-) When can we expect BSD to run
on this system and use all 64 CPUs efficiently?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2003-01-23 18:33:44 | Re: [PATCHES] targetlist functions part 1 (was targetlist |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-01-23 18:10:17 | Re: Call for objections: put back OIDs in CREATE TABLE |