| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RC1? |
| Date: | 2002-11-12 22:21:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0211121520470.25568-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
On 12 Nov 2002, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:27, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > >> Are we ready for RC1 yet?
> >
> > > Questionable. We don't even have 50% confirmation coverage for the
> > > supported platforms yet.
> >
> > We can't just wait around indefinitely for port reports that may or may
> > not ever appear. In any case, most of the "<7.3" entries in the list
> > seem to be various flavors of *BSD; I think it's unlikely we broke
> > those ...
>
> Why not send an email to the folks who last reported a supported
> platform and ask for an update? Probably won't get through to everyone,
> but it might help pare down the list of unconfirmed.
I'm testing x86 solaris right now. It's turning into a giant pain because
of how the box I'm on is configured.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-11-12 22:39:16 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-11-12 21:59:23 | Re: RC1? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2002-11-12 22:39:16 | Re: RC1? |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2002-11-12 21:59:23 | Re: RC1? |