Re: information

From: "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Florian Litot <flitot(at)besancon(dot)sema(dot)slb(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: information
Date: 2002-10-16 17:42:08
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0210161141130.4572-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Treat wrote:

> http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php
>
> this has a pretty good feature comparison, but if your looking for
> benchmarks, keep in mind that it's done by the mysql folks and probably
> biased for them. also note the latest postgresql version they have is
> 7.1.1

That's cause most of their advantages went away with the introduction
of 7.2.x. Oh, wait, they couldn't figure out vacuum. Yeah, that's the
ticket. And a giant monster stole their test server. yeah, and and and.

well you get the picture. :-)

>
> Robert Treat
>
> On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 11:30, Florian Litot wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > Somebody saw comparaisons of productivity for RDBMS?
> > or somebody do comparaisons?
> >
> > thanks
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fernando Papa 2002-10-16 18:20:07 tuplestore: write failed
Previous Message Robert Treat 2002-10-16 17:25:51 Re: transactions