| From: | "scott(dot)marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A question on performance |
| Date: | 2002-09-16 21:37:41 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0209161536220.929-100000@css120.ihs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 16 Sep 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 03:33:01AM +0000, Ron Harter wrote:
>
> > loadings and average sizes we can except anywhere from 700 to 900 updates
> > per second.
>
> > Will postgresql be able to handle that many updates per second an a
> > sustained basis (24/7)?
>
> You don't say what hardware you're planning on using. So a definite
> "maybe". If your disk is fast enough and you have enough CPUs, you
> should be able to handle it without too much trouble. But if you're
> planning on running it on an old Pentium box with 16 Meg of memory,
> you'll have a rough time ;-)
Plus, if they're updates, not inserts, he's gonna need to schedule a
vacuum to run almost continuously in the background. And he might wanna
look at moving the pg_xlog directory to another drive
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Edwin Grubbs | 2002-09-16 21:45:30 | connecting inside pl/pgsql |
| Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2002-09-16 21:34:42 | Re: question regarding regular expressions |