Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2

From: "Roderick A(dot) Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
To: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sourceforge moving to DB2
Date: 2002-08-14 18:36:39
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0208141131180.17583-100000@main.cyber-office.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

> There is, however, the "open secret" problem still: not everyone in
> the company, including some very senior people, like talking very much
> about our use of PostgreSQL (although I believe that is changing).

I am running into a similar situation. Commercial verses OpenSource.
When I suggested an OpenSource solution (in this case it wasn't a
database) I heard that no one knows it whereas they know about xxx. I had
never heard of xxx, oh well.
In another situation the client wanted bragging rights. At $1500 a pop
for extra licenses (5 i believe) they can brag all they want. Me, I'd
spend the money on infrastruture.

Rod
--
"Open Source Software - Sometimes you get more than you paid for..."

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Swinth 2002-08-14 18:40:50 Re: Transaction Exception Question
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2002-08-14 18:16:18 Re: Evaluating PostgreSQL for Production Web App