Re: Urgent: Tuning strategies?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>
To: Markus Wollny <Markus(dot)Wollny(at)computec(dot)de>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Urgent: Tuning strategies?
Date: 2002-06-25 16:44:26
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0206251019410.24912-100000@css120.ihs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

I'll add one more observation here:

On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Markus Wollny wrote:

> wal_buffers = 32
> wal_files = 64

Everyone else already mentioned the shared mem and sort mem, but I've
found that while increasing wal_buffers and wal_files helps, 64 WAL files
is probably overkill.

I'd suggest the strategy to take your postgresql.conf file to stock, run a
dozen or so slow queries at once, then make ONE CHANGE at a time and see
how much of a difference it makes.

And remember, just because a little helps does NOT mean a lot will. Often
it's the first change that makes the biggest difference.

--
"Force has no place where there is need of skill.", "Haste in every
business brings failures.", "This is the bitterest pain among men, to have
much knowledge but no power." -- Herodotus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2002-06-25 17:06:33 Re: Multiversion Concurrency Control!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-06-25 15:28:44 Re: indexes greatly slowing data entry