Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)atentus(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: interfaces/ecpg/preproc reduce/reduce conflicts
Date: 2002-05-17 14:47:54
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0205171045340.1076-100000@polluelo.lab.protecne.cl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 16 May 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> > Just noticed this a few minutes ago on build from cvs tip:
> > make -C preproc all
> > make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/src/pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc'
> > bison -y -d preproc.y
> > conflicts: 2 reduce/reduce
>
> Yeah, the ECPG grammar has been broken for awhile. I'm expecting
> Michael to do something about it sooner or later ...

It's not just the grammar. Last time I tried to compile OSDB to get some
benchmarking done, ecpg segfaulted on it (before having any reduce
conflict). I tried to do some investigation, but my knowledge was too
limited and couldn't even generate a decent bug report.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[(at)]dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>)
"Nunca se desea ardientemente lo que solo se desea por razon" (F. Alexandre)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2002-05-17 15:32:21 More schema queries
Previous Message Joel Burton 2002-05-17 13:57:39 Re: Updated CREATE FUNCTION syntax