Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

From: Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Date: 2002-01-21 14:16:37
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0201211409520.29759-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> We carry a BSD license, the archetypal open-source license. While the
> GPL also promotes open-source,
^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^

Spot the recipe for disaster :-)

"While the GPL expresses many of our goals,"

> it has certain anti-closed source (proprietary) restrictions. Many
> PostgreSQL developers question the need for such restrictions. We
> like our BSD license and see no need to change it.

I don't really like "Many PostgreSQL developers question
the need for such restrictions." It may be that they do,
but that's not the point; the point is that you don't
want them, not that they are inherently inappropriate
(whether you believe that or not).

Matthew.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Holger Klawitter 2002-01-21 14:20:12 Re: Problem with character ' (single quote) in text fields
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-01-21 14:08:38 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-21 14:20:51 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-01-21 14:10:29 Re: Ready for RC1?