Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)

From: "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA(at)rki(dot)de>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
Date: 2001-11-19 13:27:58
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191425240.27841-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:

> > It is no specific query case. It is the speed of an index scan which
> > goes like N if you do it with PostgreSQL and it goes like log N if
> > you do not have to look back into the table like MS SQL server does.
>
> I cannot see why you keep saying that. It is simply not true.
> MS SQL shows a behavior of O(N), it is simply, that PostgreSQL
> because of well described methodology takes longer per affected row.
> The speed difference is linear, no matter how many rows
> are affected.
I´m basing my assumption on the statement of my colleague. He
told me that consequent index usage results in O(log N) behaviour.
I´m really no expert in database theory but if you like I can foreward
your question.

Kind regards

Andreas.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2001-11-19 13:35:04 Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD 2001-11-19 12:55:10 Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)