From: | "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA(at)rki(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) |
Date: | 2001-11-19 13:27:58 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191425240.27841-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > It is no specific query case. It is the speed of an index scan which
> > goes like N if you do it with PostgreSQL and it goes like log N if
> > you do not have to look back into the table like MS SQL server does.
>
> I cannot see why you keep saying that. It is simply not true.
> MS SQL shows a behavior of O(N), it is simply, that PostgreSQL
> because of well described methodology takes longer per affected row.
> The speed difference is linear, no matter how many rows
> are affected.
I´m basing my assumption on the statement of my colleague. He
told me that consequent index usage results in O(log N) behaviour.
I´m really no expert in database theory but if you like I can foreward
your question.
Kind regards
Andreas.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-11-19 13:35:04 | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) |
Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2001-11-19 12:55:10 | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) |