| From: | "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA(at)rki(dot)de> | 
|---|---|
| To: | |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) | 
| Date: | 2001-11-19 13:27:58 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191425240.27841-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Mon, 19 Nov 2001, Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote:
> > It is no specific query case.  It is the speed of an index scan which
> > goes like N if you do it with PostgreSQL and it goes like log N if
> > you do not have to look back into the table like MS SQL server does.
>
> I cannot see why you keep saying that. It is simply not true.
> MS SQL shows a behavior of O(N), it is simply, that PostgreSQL
> because of well described methodology takes longer per affected row.
> The speed difference is linear, no matter how many rows
> are affected.
I´m basing my assumption on the statement of my colleague.  He
told me that consequent index usage results in O(log N) behaviour.
I´m really no expert in database theory but if you like I can foreward
your question.
Kind regards
Andreas.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2001-11-19 13:35:04 | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) | 
| Previous Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD | 2001-11-19 12:55:10 | Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2) |