Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)

From: "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA(at)rki(dot)de>
To:
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)
Date: 2001-11-19 12:06:09
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0111191303570.27841-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I personally would like to have index scans that look up heap rows
> record the heap expired status into the index entry via one bit of
> storage. This will not _prevent_ checking the heap but it will prevent
> heap lookups for index entries that have been exipred for a long time.
> However, with the new vacuum, and perhaps autovacuum coming soon, may be
> little need for this optimization.
>
> The underlying problem the user is seeing is how to _know_ an index
> tuple is valid without checking the heap, and I don't see how to do that
> unless we start storing the transaction id in the index tuple, and that
> requires extra storage.
For my special case I think doubling main memory is about the same
price as a MS SQL server license. I can´t say which further problems
might occure.

Kind regards

Andreas.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-11-19 12:39:01 Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
Previous Message Tille, Andreas 2001-11-19 12:03:17 Re: Further open item (Was: Status of 7.2)