From: | Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
Date: | 2001-10-04 18:59:44 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0110041158550.5356-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
Thanks Thomas...at least there will be a way to specify more than 2. we are looking forward to this release...
L.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> Laurette Cisneros wrote:
> >
> > Could I get some more specific information on how this is fixed. Keep in mind that using tochar() is not an option for us in that we ned to use COPY to/from the client.
>
> I'm finishing up implementing SQL99-style precision features in
> timestamp et al, so there will no longer be an arbitrary rounding of
> time to 2 decimal places when values are output. There will of course be
> *other* issues for you to worry about, since the default precision
> specified by SQL99 is zero decimal places...
>
> - Thomas
>
--
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-10-04 19:16:02 | Re: Patch for fixing a few memory leaks |
Previous Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-10-04 18:51:26 | Re: how to increase the back end process |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2001-10-04 20:13:17 | Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem |
Previous Message | Rene Pijlman | 2001-10-04 18:50:48 | Re: JDBC 2.0 |