Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem

From: Laurette Cisneros <laurette(at)nextbus(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Date: 2001-10-04 18:59:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0110041158550.5356-100000@visor.corp.nextbus.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

Thanks Thomas...at least there will be a way to specify more than 2. we are looking forward to this release...

L.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> Laurette Cisneros wrote:
> >
> > Could I get some more specific information on how this is fixed. Keep in mind that using tochar() is not an option for us in that we ned to use COPY to/from the client.
>
> I'm finishing up implementing SQL99-style precision features in
> timestamp et al, so there will no longer be an arbitrary rounding of
> time to 2 decimal places when values are output. There will of course be
> *other* issues for you to worry about, since the default precision
> specified by SQL99 is zero decimal places...
>
> - Thomas
>

--
Laurette Cisneros
(510) 420-3137
NextBus Information Systems, Inc.
www.nextbus.com
Passenger Information Everywhere

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-04 19:16:02 Re: Patch for fixing a few memory leaks
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-10-04 18:51:26 Re: how to increase the back end process

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-10-04 20:13:17 Re: [HACKERS] Timestamp, fractional seconds problem
Previous Message Rene Pijlman 2001-10-04 18:50:48 Re: JDBC 2.0