Re: MySQL's (false?) claims... (was: Re: PL/java?)

From: Sam Tregar <sam(at)tregar(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: MySQL's (false?) claims... (was: Re: PL/java?)
Date: 2001-08-26 17:51:53
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.33.0108261349380.32607-100000@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Many of these advantages can easily interpreted as disadvantages. For
> example:

Have you ever considered a career in marketting?

> => In MySQL you have to repair your tables manually if corruption occurs.
> PostgreSQL is coded so that corruption cannot occur.

Ho ho. This one is my favorite.

-sam

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Clark C . Evans 2001-08-26 17:57:59 Interaction Record (Journal Table?)
Previous Message Digital Wokan 2001-08-26 17:50:32 Re: Re: MySQL's (false?) claims... (was: Re: PL/java?)