From: | Anders Bengtsson <ndrsbngtssn(at)yahoo(dot)se> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
Date: | 2001-08-02 19:03:55 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0108022052560.1652-100000@sensenet.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001, Barry Lind wrote:
> There are actually a couple of reasons why the jdbc driver can't do this:
>
> 1) The client doesn't know that the column being deleted is a blob. All
> it can know is that the data type of the column is oid. Oids can be
> used for many reasons, one of which is blobs. The code can't assume
> that just because a column is of type oid that it represents a blob.
I'm thinking that it should be possible to create some kind of
compatability mode for the driver. If you knew for sure that you we're
only using OIDs for BLOBs, then that assumption would be safe (?). Would
something like that be possible to create, or am I missing something
here?
Of course, this could add too much complexity to the driver.
/Anders
_____________________________________________________________________
A n d e r s B e n g t s s o n ndrsbngtssn(at)yahoo(dot)se
Stockholm, Sweden
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fernando Nasser | 2001-08-02 19:24:01 | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |
Previous Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2001-08-02 18:47:16 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2001-08-02 19:26:31 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |
Previous Message | Anders Bengtsson | 2001-08-02 18:47:16 | Re: Re: What needs to be done? |