| From: | Matthew Kirkwood <matthew(at)hairy(dot)beasts(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Naomi Walker <nwalker(at)eldocomp(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "P(dot) Dwayne Miller" <dmiller(at)espgroup(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Backup and Recovery |
| Date: | 2001-06-20 11:26:22 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.33.0106201212240.25630-100000@sphinx.mythic-beasts.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Naomi Walker wrote:
> Even more important that uptime to us, is to never put ourselves in a
> position where we could lose data. I understand I can do a hot backup
> with pg_dumpall. What we need on top of that is the ability to replay
> the transaction logs against the previous database archive. Without
> such a feature, even if I did a full backup a few times a day, we
> would be vulnerable to losing hours of data (which would not be
> acceptable to our users).
This is what I'd like too (though I'm not that bothered about
rolling forward from a dump if I can just do it by replaying
logs onto real datafiles).
I mentioned it a while ago:
http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=114397
but got no response.
You are aware that you can still lose up to (by default) 16Mb
worth of transactions in this scheme, I presume?
Matthew.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2001-06-20 11:38:03 | Re: |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-20 11:16:21 | Re: RE: Universal admin frontend |