| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | David Ford <david+cert(at)blue-labs(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: very concerning, tables hopped from one database to |
| Date: | 2002-04-22 20:17:01 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0204221615370.692-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane writes:
> > Perhaps the socket blew up and psql reconnected to template1?
>
> I think psql will attempt automatic reconnection after a connection
> failure in some cases, but AFAIK it should always reconnect to the last
> database in use. (Hmm, but if it had originally connected to template1,
> and the \connect to hmzbook was inside a script, maybe the reconnect
> would go to template1? Peter, can you give us any insight on the
> possible behaviors there?)
psql only attempts to reconnect to anything if the session is interactive.
Otherwise psql exits right there if the connection went bad (independent
of ON_ERROR_STOP).
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2002-04-22 20:23:28 | Re: Possible pl/pgsql bug |
| Previous Message | Francisco Reyes | 2002-04-22 19:28:11 | Which OS better for postgresql? FreeBSD or Linux? |