Re: Debugging symbols by default

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Debugging symbols by default
Date: 2002-04-08 15:56:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204081143580.685-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian writes:

> I am not sure about the idea of -g by default. I know lyx uses -g by
> default, and the compile/install takes forever. In fact, I have removed
> -g from my compiles here because it takes too long to compile/link and I
> do it too often. When I need to debug, I recompile with -g. My concern
> is that we may start to look very bloated with -g and those huge
> binaries. My question is whether it is worth the install slowness/bloat?

PostgreSQL compile time is minimal compared to other packages. If you're
worried about 30 seconds, turn off the optimization or use parallel make.
If you see yourself doing a full build too often, turn on dependency
tracking. The extra time you spend building with -g is the time you save
yourself and the users from having to recompile everything because a bug
needs to be tracked down. And when you rebuild, the bug might not be
reproduceable.

I don't buy the disk space argument either. If you're worried about a few
megabytes then you going to have a lot of trouble running a database.
And if you're still worried, you can run install-strip, which is the
standard way to do it.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-08 16:07:04 Re: timeout implementation issues
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-04-08 15:32:50 Re: timeout implementation issues