Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring pg_aggregate
Date: 2002-04-06 22:50:01
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0204061748070.683-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> Why shouldn't aggregate functions have entries in pg_proc? Then one
> search would cover both possibilities, and we could eliminate some
> duplicate code in the parser.

Furthermore, we could make the new function privileges apply to aggregates
as well.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-04-06 23:16:22 Re: timeout implementation issues
Previous Message Jessica Perry Hekman 2002-04-06 22:23:00 Re: timeout implementation issues