Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Date: 2002-03-11 01:10:17
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0203102007390.684-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> > #define NUMERIC_MAX_PRECISION 1000
>
> I was thinking just the other day that there's no reason for that
> limit to be so low. Jan, couldn't we bump it up to 8 or 16K or so?

Why have an arbitrary limit at all? Set it to INT_MAX, or whatever the
index variables have for a type.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-03-11 01:12:40 Re: numeric/decimal docs bug?
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2002-03-10 18:50:29 Re: need help