| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: elog() proposal |
| Date: | 2002-02-24 16:57:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0202241156150.686-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane writes:
> Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> writes:
> > I'm with Peter on this one; let's find another more neutral name.
>
> Proposals then? What's been used or bandied about so far are
> "REALLYFATAL" (yuck, even though I take the blame for it).
> "STOP" (Vadim put this in, but I object to it as being too vague;
> it's not at all obvious that it's worse than FATAL).
> "FATALALL" (also yuck).
I think FATALALL is good, because it tells you exactly what is going on,
namely the same as FATAL but for all sessions.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-24 16:57:19 | Re: elog() proposal |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-24 16:44:09 | Re: elog() proposal |