From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Maintaining the list of release changes |
Date: | 2002-02-16 01:43:11 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0202152039450.681-100000@peter.localdomain |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Seems there are two uses for the CHANGES file, one is to enable
> developers to see what has been added to the tree since they last
> looked, best solved with cvslog,
No, a cvslog is in nature different from a list of user-visible changes.
We're not talking about the core group of developers here that read the
committers list anyway, we're talking about people that only look once in
a while and want to check development progress, try out the latest
features, and avoid sending in patches for things that are already done.
> and second, to make it easier to
> package the final HISTORY changes, which is 100x easier to do in one
> shot from the cvs logs than piecemeal.
There is no piecemeal. If it's all in one place you just copy it over.
It's impossible to beat that.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2002-02-16 01:53:00 | Re: FWD: overlaps() bug? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2002-02-16 01:35:49 | Re: Change in casting behavior? |