| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New system OIDS inside include/catalog/pg_proc.h |
| Date: | 2002-01-25 16:11:34 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0201251108150.690-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Greg Sabino Mullane writes:
> What are the guidelines for choosing a
> new number when creating (for example) a pg_tempname() function?
Just pick the first one that's available.
~/pgsql/src/include/catalog$ ./unused_oids
3 - 11
90
99
109 - 111
143
652
1076 - 1077
2019
2071 - 9999
Maybe the single-digits should stay reserved for some truly important
objects or magic use, but for any old functionI'd start at 90, or if you
make a group of three functions use 109-111, or if you make a group of 25
objects, start at 2071. In short, it doesn't matter, but try to make a
little sense.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-25 16:32:37 | Re: RTREE Index on primary key generated by a sequence |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-25 16:04:12 | Re: New system OIDS inside include/catalog/pg_proc.h |