Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at>, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Date: 2002-01-25 04:00:57
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.30.0201242259280.686-100000@peter.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane writes:

> It'd be nice though if
> the behavior could be changed after connection by a SET statement, which
> would be lots easier if the setting were GUC-controlled. Peter, you see
> any way to resolve that?

We had a text[] field to pg_shadow and/or pg_database containing
name=value assignments which are executed just before the session starts.
Doesn't look terribly difficult, and it's something I've always wanted to
do anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-01-25 04:23:39 Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-01-25 03:26:43 Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects