| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, <chumphries(at)devis(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO item question |
| Date: | 2002-01-23 03:58:13 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.30.0201222257110.686-100000@peter.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Do we have session _variables_ as a TODO item ?
> >
> > Currently the only way to implement session variables is to stuff them
> > in temp tables ?
>
> No we don't and no one has asked for them, _yet_.
Tables are the quintessential way to store data in SQL. Session data goes
into session-temporary tables. No need for session "variables" that I can
see.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-23 05:07:57 | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-01-23 02:30:15 | Re: TODO item question |